1 Introduction

Network Science in Action: A Classroom Vignette

In 1992, as part of their work with Global Lab, an environmentally- focused network science curriculum developed at TERC, students at Pease Middle School in San Antonio, Texas examined their classroom's indoor air quality. They determined that over the course of a school day, carbon dioxide levels exceeded the recommended limit of 1000 parts per million. Mindful of complaints about poor air throughout the school, the students went on to conduct a school-wide survey of air quality in other locations and sought the opinions of the faculty. CO2 levels in other classrooms were as high as 2100 ppm. Outdoor CO2 readings were 350 ppm. The class's results were presented to the school board, which dispatched four environmental control officers to investigate. Their teacher, Linda Maston, reported on the computer network what ensued.
They [the officers] first went into the counseling office 
where the counselors and teachers told them about what was 
going on. They were not impressed, so they were brought to 
our classroom. As soon as we pulled out the data and the 
graphs showing the patterns that we had found, they suddenly 
started to take notes.

The officers decided to make readings with their professional equipment. Linda continued:

The moment of glory came this afternoon when they showed up 
with the same kind of tubes we had, and their fancy pump got 
exactly the same reading as we had with our syringe version!

The students used the Alice Network Software to post a request on the Global Lab network for collaborative data:

What are some of the CO2 levels that people are getting 
inside their various classrooms? Ours are just extremely high.

From their Global Lab colleagues in Aiken, South Carolina, the students received this reply:

Hello San Antonio: We read your report about carbon dioxide and 
have a similar case here in Aiken, SC. All of our classrooms 
have windows but we did a project which tried to test the 
carbon dioxide levels in the trailers where a lot of our 
classes are. Dr. Borst thought that they would have higher 
levels.  Not!! The regular classrooms had higher levels... 
We explained this by the hallways. Regular classrooms open into 
hallways, while the trailers open into the outdoors... So when 
the class changes you get fresh air in the trailers. In the 
regular classroom you get stale air from the hall. Kennedy 
Middle School, Aiken, SC.

From their experiments, the students had concluded that high CO2 levels were the cause of the poor air at Pease. But after on-line discussions with Ken Muzal, an air quality and industrial hygiene specialist who was serving as a Global Lab mentor-scientist, they went on to conclude:

Given the nature of our school, how it was built, and the 
pattern of CO2 levels that we had observed . . .it was very 
obvious that we had a problem with inadequate ventilation.

The students' actions had demanded responsibility and results; in turn, the school's ventilation system was repaired. Not only had the students conducted authentic scientific research, their findings had made a true difference in their lives and in their community. As Linda concluded:

The CO2 study was [the students'] pride and joy. They were 
just so pleased and proud of themselves that they had managed 
to do what nobody else had been able to accomplish in 17 years. 
To have their data taken seriously by adults in general, and 
the district in particular, was just awesome for them.

The Testbed for Telecollaboration

Goals

The Testbed for Telecollaboration ("The Testbed") and its predecessor, the Alice/Collaborative Inquiry Testbed, were initially funded by the National Science Foundation in 1992 to test the conjecture that student and teacher collaboration via telecommunications would have beneficial impact on the learning and teaching of science. The expectation was that the Testbed results would be helpful to practitioners in making use of new technology as it becomes available to classrooms, to project administrators and curriculum writers as they create new curriculum projects, and to educational leaders and policy-makers as they address issues about how best to improve science education.

A New Vision

Science education is in dire need of improvement. Educators have learned the limitations of textbook science, where students' involvement is limited to learning about the discoveries of others. In contrast, a new vision for learning science has emerged which recognizes the central importance of students experiencing the adventure of science. Students experience this adventure by working in a way similar to that of practicing scientists. In this model, students learn to think like scientists by working with data and addressing substantive problems, and learn to collaborate as scientists by working with peers and mentors to plan and carry out an investigation, to communicate and debate the findings, and to evaluate their own work and the work of others.

Network Science

This vision of science learning is particularly powerful in a network context where students throughout the world can collaborate with other students and with interested scientist-mentors. At the heart of the Testbed is an educational model developed by TERC for the use of telecommunications in collaborative inquiry. We call this model "Network Science." Described in detail in Chapter 2 and embodied in curricula such as Global Lab, NGS Kids Networkreg., and EPA/Nebraska Wetlands: A Telecommunications Curriculum,2 this model is characterized by investigation of real science problems, collaboration within a class and among classrooms, shared goals, shared data, shared knowledge building, and technology-enhanced projects.

The model emerged from our work with the various Testbed projects, and is grounded in TERC's work over the past decade in developing the educational power of technology, including the curriculum projects listed above and LabNet, an on-line teacher-to-teacher forum to support the improvement of science teaching and learning. It is also informed by other educational uses of networks, including Global SchoolNet Foundation (formerly FrEdMail) and AT&T Learning Network.

The Network Science model is a general model of telecollaboration currently being developed and researched by TERC. The model is designed to be adapted for various purposes, e.g., for teachers with less experience with technology or collaborative curricula, or for the study of social sciences.

The Alice Network Software

In order to develop this model for science education, TERC has designed and developed prototype software, the Alice Network Software, for data representation, data analysis, and simplified telecommunication. In addition to the software used by students and teachers, TERC has also designed and built an Internet-connected database that automatically consolidates data from a large number of sites. The goal of this technology development has been to create powerful yet easy-to-use software that can operate in a typical school environment, where telecommunications is limited at present by use of modems and telephone lines for connections.

The technical sections of the present handbook are based on the Alice Network Software versions 2.02 and 2.1. However, the software continues to develop. At the time of publication, TERC is working on version 3.0, a major redesign that will be more modular in character, more flexible, easier to set up and use, and that will utilize direct IP (Internet) connectivity down to the classroom level (while still retaining access for classrooms without IP connectivity). In Chapter 3 we describe the current versions of the Alice Network Software and how they support each stage of student telecollaborative inquiry.

Project Support from the Testbed Staff

The Testbed has resources to assist projects in initiating, establishing, and running Network Science projects. The most recent information on the Testbed is electronically posted at TERC (accessible via World Wide Web, Gopher, and FTP. See Appendix C for how to access this information electronically). All materials can also be mailed out; please call us or send us e-mail (see How to Contact Us, p. iv). Support services currently available include:

New Partners

The Testbed is looking for a range of projects to work with. We invite inquiries from individuals or organizations with a view to incorporating further projects in the Testbed. We are particularly interested in projects that will extend the range of topics (e.g., geography, social science, teacher enhancement) or participant groups. Projects in the planning stage are generally preferred to projects already underway.

If you have a project in mind that you think would be suitable for a Testbed project, please contact us. (See How to Contact Us ).

At the present time, the Testbed can only serve projects and not individual teachers looking to join a project. In the future, we expect to provide a service for teachers to log into a database and find projects to join or other teachers with similar interests.

Project Assistance

Testbed staff are available to assist projects in a variety of ways. For projects that are fully participating members of the Testbed, we may provide assistance in areas such as the following (according to availability of staff): Rather than a full affiliation with the Testbed, projects may want to make use of some of the services of the Testbed. For example, a project may want to make use of the Automated Data Sharing services; this may also be arranged.

The Testbed has limited funding to assist with these tasks; projects with funding are expected to assist with the costs.

Research Program

All Projects affiliated with the Testbed are asked to cooperate with our Research Program. Each project is seen as advancing the state of the art of telecollaborating and the lessons learned in one project will be shared with other projects.


Go to next section Go to Table of Contents Go to Hypertext Index