![]() |
"Collaborative Inquiry in Networked Communities: Lessons From the Alice Testbed" Table of Contents Background Network Science Model Scalability The Software Innovation Testbed Projects: Developing a Model What Have We Learned About Network Science? What Have We Learned About Scalability? Summary Appendix: Description of Testbed Projects Bibliography |
Following several months of planning with collaborating projects, the pilot phase of the Alice Testbed got underway in September 1993 with the distribution of a functional prototype of the Alice Network Software. Global Lab distributed the software to its 120 participating schools (40 outside the United States) in September. Since then, five additional projects have joined the testbed; the most recent, in Quincy, Massachusetts, consists of 20 teachers from two schools, one elementary and one middle school. These two projects bracket our experience to date over six months: one large testbed project, initiated by TERC and funded by an NSF grant; one small testbed project, initiated by a group of teachers, and funded by a small state grant. Each of the six projects is helping us define the educational potential for Network Science and the issues of deployment.
| Name | Number of Sites | Dates |
|---|---|---|
| Global Lab Building Investigative Skills and Research Strands |
120 schools, including 40 outside the U.S. | 9/93 thru 6/94 |
| EPA/Nebraska Wetlands |
26 schools, distributed across U.S. | 10/93 thru 11/93 |
| TERC/Kids Network Field test of Human Body curriculum |
31 schools, distributed across U.S. | 2/94 thru 3/94 |
| TERC/Kids Network Field test of Water Quality curriculum |
52 schools, distributed across U.S. | 4/94 thru 5/94 |
| EPA/Nebraska Amphibians as Bio-Indicators |
23 schools, distributed across U.S. | 3/94 thru 5/94 |
| Quincy Public Schools Black Creek Estuary Study |
20 teachers in 2 schools, all in one city | 3/94 thru 5/94 |
Both TERC/Kids Network and EPA/Nebraska have organized and run two projects. As the second of the pair is currently getting underway, we are in a good position to see if the lessons learned from the earlier project are being effectively used to inform the second project. Note also that these projects vary greatly in size and organization. The Quincy Public Schools project is a Groundswell Project, having been initiated by teachers.
We anticipate additional projects joining the Alice Testbed in the coming months, including AIRNET, an air-quality monitoring project that has grown out of the work of three high schools in New Hampshire. We are considering incorporating our model of Network Science into several teacher workshops this summer; from each of these workshops we expect that one or more projects may emerge.
The process of working with each group to define their participation in the testbed has led to clarification about the various components that make up an Alice Testbed project. We have distilled our understanding of these components, and use the model shown below with our potential project collaborators to define the characteristics of each project within the testbed.
| Component | Comments |
|---|---|
Organization
| |
| goals and purposes | Is the group clear about what it wants to achieve? What is the groupšs understanding of Network Science? |
| selection of sites | Identify how project will be announced; how sites will be selected; what equipment and time are needed, grade range, expectations for participation. |
| coordination and scheduling | Create schedule that reflects schedules of school sites, e.g., vacations. Maximize flexibility for all participants. |
| funding | Identify costs, funding sources, responsibilities. |
| network support, software support |
Identify individuals responsible for support functions among school staff, state department of education, publisher, Alice Testbed staff, other project staff. |
| general | Will the level of organization, amount of funding, and
skill of participating teachers and students support the goals and purposes? |
Model of learning |
|
| Are activities structured and uniform among classes? How much variation is allowed among classes? within a class? Are students encouraged to develop their own questions, and to explore these questions? | |
Participants
| |
| sites | Number and distribution, languages spoken, school schedules. |
| teachers, students | Background with technology, science, other networked science projects; grade levels; subjects; goals and motivations for participating. |
Teacher development | What are the goals of the teachers? How will this project help them reach them? |
| model of learning | Teachers need to understand the model of learning in the curriculum: process and content goals, learning strategies. |
| curriculum training | Teachers need familiarity with the curriculum, especially if collaborative inquiry is new. |
| software training | Teachers need familiarity with the software: another teacher? a student? videotape? tutorial? exploration? |
| on-going support | Identify who a teacher can go to with questions about the curriculum, or about the software. How will the project support the professional development of the teachers? Use electronic forums? face-to-face meetings of local teachers? mentors? |
| Curriculum
| |
| content pedagogy network strategy
| Identify responsibility for curriculum, and whether outline, resource book, or detailed plan is being created. In addition to content and pedagogy, network curricula need a clear model for network use. |
| external review | Schedule time for review of curriculum materials. |
Research | |
| student assessment | Teachers most often assess their students; can their assessment be shared? Identify any common instruments to be used. |
| project assessment | What approach, what questions, what data, who will collect, who will analyze. Key questions: what evidence do we have that students are learning? what are they learning? is the curriculum or approach ready for dissemination? |
Network Resources | Identify resources. |
| data consolidation server | Who manages the server, setting up data tables in the database, fixing problems, and creating reports. |
| on-line scientists | Who selects, orients, maintains liaison. |
Technologies for sites | |
| connectivity | Through which network(s) will the participants communicate; what are the costs and how are they covered. |
| software | Alice Network Software, or other, or mixed; additional software for data analysis (spreadsheets, GIS). |
| others | Examples: measuring instruments for ground level ozone, atmospheric ozone (TCO). |
Partnerships
| Organizations bringing resources: content knowledge, technology skills, network access, funding, experience in network science. |
| Dissemination
| |
| editorial and quality review publishing marketing financial responsibility and benefit | For many projects, dissemination of their materials is an important goal. Identify responsibilities in these key areas. |